Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-27 08:36:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6411705A5C55B5B105085C0A6DE362BCB800BF7BF59C0A3F855B1D4A8C60B0BE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Not misleading, their personal opinion is that this reflects poorly on some of the parties involved. Additionally they didn't give a false date for this printing or misleading framing.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717302225725206691
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6411705A5C55B5B105085C0A6DE362BCB800BF7BF59C0A3F855B1D4A8C60B0BE
  • createdAtMillis - 1698395792712
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17173022257252066916411705A5C55B5B105085C0A6DE362BCB800BF7BF59C0A3F855B1D4A8C60B0BE