Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-23 03:32:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CEDF14DB83FE181E9604AC80B709827E0C5D80F4D48909B3EE0B4822E9F65663
Participant Details

Original Note:

"[I]ndicat[ion]" can be indirect. Users can post reasonable inferences that others consider to be unsupported without CN opining otherwise. The next post in the thread elaborates on the inference being drawn, which is reasonable given that CISA concerned itself with mis/dis-info.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717279407600243003
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CEDF14DB83FE181E9604AC80B709827E0C5D80F4D48909B3EE0B4822E9F65663
  • createdAtMillis - 1705980777730
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1717279407600243003CEDF14DB83FE181E9604AC80B709827E0C5D80F4D48909B3EE0B4822E9F65663