Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-25 20:46:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B74ACF79861AED6952B9FBA6B518FC91A237BD86C3DFD293E99FC1ADDA9C0DB5
Participant Details

Original Note:

"[I]ndicat[ion]" can be indirect. Users can post reasonable inferences that others consider to be unsupported without CN opining otherwise. The next post in the thread elaborates on the inference being drawn, which is reasonable given that CISA concerned itself with mis/dis-info.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717279407600243003
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B74ACF79861AED6952B9FBA6B518FC91A237BD86C3DFD293E99FC1ADDA9C0DB5
  • createdAtMillis - 1698266812638
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1717279407600243003B74ACF79861AED6952B9FBA6B518FC91A237BD86C3DFD293E99FC1ADDA9C0DB5