Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-23 02:25:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A5ECFCF3FDB488CBB14CBEED7625B788901E803E013BF0A2E169675A198E9E1E
Participant Details

Original Note:

"[I]ndicat[ion]" can be indirect. Users can post reasonable inferences that others consider to be unsupported without CN opining otherwise. The next post in the thread elaborates on the inference being drawn, which is reasonable given that CISA concerned itself with mis/dis-info.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717279407600243003
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A5ECFCF3FDB488CBB14CBEED7625B788901E803E013BF0A2E169675A198E9E1E
  • createdAtMillis - 1705976728672
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1717279407600243003A5ECFCF3FDB488CBB14CBEED7625B788901E803E013BF0A2E169675A198E9E1E