Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-24 05:51:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2286AD210C96E4BA4800A872CA10CD7391B75B0C3B563BF0A81F05DCD3CECE27
Participant Details

Original Note:

"[I]ndicat[ion]" can be indirect. Users can post reasonable inferences that others consider to be unsupported without CN opining otherwise. The next post in the thread elaborates on the inference being drawn, which is reasonable given that CISA concerned itself with mis/dis-info.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717279407600243003
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2286AD210C96E4BA4800A872CA10CD7391B75B0C3B563BF0A81F05DCD3CECE27
  • createdAtMillis - 1706075485556
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17172794076002430032286AD210C96E4BA4800A872CA10CD7391B75B0C3B563BF0A81F05DCD3CECE27