Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-24 06:59:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1AC71C3B1C6BA336355B32F4F6457CD371130795B2CCADC038586C29C48A492C
Participant Details

Original Note:

"[I]ndicat[ion]" can be indirect. Users can post reasonable inferences that others consider to be unsupported without CN opining otherwise. The next post in the thread elaborates on the inference being drawn, which is reasonable given that CISA concerned itself with mis/dis-info.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717279407600243003
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1AC71C3B1C6BA336355B32F4F6457CD371130795B2CCADC038586C29C48A492C
  • createdAtMillis - 1706079561382
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17172794076002430031AC71C3B1C6BA336355B32F4F6457CD371130795B2CCADC038586C29C48A492C