Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-25 22:45:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 38CA4A28925DBFB6D65CE37C074C604B9B192B550AB877839C771AE2C7CEBEE1
Participant Details

Original Note:

PHOs numbers being cited by different organisation is not proof of accuracy, especially when there lacks an alternative. OP is claiming the numbers have a potential bias, which is an opinion. Notes should only contain direct evidence to the contrary.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717268107750723881
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 38CA4A28925DBFB6D65CE37C074C604B9B192B550AB877839C771AE2C7CEBEE1
  • createdAtMillis - 1698273931119
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171726810775072388138CA4A28925DBFB6D65CE37C074C604B9B192B550AB877839C771AE2C7CEBEE1