Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-26 05:41:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF4ABCB8B3F2C4B4156AF786C7F103BFA7A11F0B8A416BC0CA72ED2AB74C698B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note lacks basic reading comprehension, the tweet is saying the opposite of what the CN attributes it to say. Also the proposed note is needlessly argumentative

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717255990330974576
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BF4ABCB8B3F2C4B4156AF786C7F103BFA7A11F0B8A416BC0CA72ED2AB74C698B
  • createdAtMillis - 1698298910255
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1717255990330974576BF4ABCB8B3F2C4B4156AF786C7F103BFA7A11F0B8A416BC0CA72ED2AB74C698B