Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-26 03:00:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C8AE12A0EFAFE38DE941F1973991F45944111EDEF28E5E6FF8076DFC1679088
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note lacks basic reading comprehension, the tweet is saying the opposite of what the CN attributes it to say. Also the proposed note is needlessly argumentative

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717255990330974576
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C8AE12A0EFAFE38DE941F1973991F45944111EDEF28E5E6FF8076DFC1679088
  • createdAtMillis - 1698289228332
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17172559903309745764C8AE12A0EFAFE38DE941F1973991F45944111EDEF28E5E6FF8076DFC1679088