Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-26 05:16:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 05B7BE7D3F65560D6EB6CC05C676D958A1BA5F0F75779A108B25F39A0B289F5E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note lacks basic reading comprehension, the tweet is saying the opposite of what the CN attributes it to say. Also the proposed note is needlessly argumentative

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717255990330974576
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 05B7BE7D3F65560D6EB6CC05C676D958A1BA5F0F75779A108B25F39A0B289F5E
  • createdAtMillis - 1698297394147
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171725599033097457605B7BE7D3F65560D6EB6CC05C676D958A1BA5F0F75779A108B25F39A0B289F5E