Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-26 04:35:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 054A46E77687CD48E5B830248EB17DEB76F8A5F9A3C3222B91E7438645B92AF1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note lacks basic reading comprehension, the tweet is saying the opposite of what the CN attributes it to say. Also the proposed note is needlessly argumentative

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717255990330974576
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 054A46E77687CD48E5B830248EB17DEB76F8A5F9A3C3222B91E7438645B92AF1
  • createdAtMillis - 1698294938446
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1717255990330974576054A46E77687CD48E5B830248EB17DEB76F8A5F9A3C3222B91E7438645B92AF1