Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-25 15:14:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E3532493AE255E078D77B39DFBAF66ED11A0AAE51ECA10B0C7C265E4E5B67619
Participant Details

Original Note:

Si les limites méthodologiques de Cluster17 sont réelles, cela n'a pas empêché l'institut d'être un de ceux ayant le mieux prévu le résultat de la présidentielle 2022. Les autres instituts ayant, entre autres, largement sous-estimé le score de Jean-Luc Mélenchon. https://datapolitics.fr/presidentielle-retour-sur-la-performance-des-differents-sondeurs/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1717171043154936248
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E3532493AE255E078D77B39DFBAF66ED11A0AAE51ECA10B0C7C265E4E5B67619
createdAtMillis - 1698246893203
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1717171043154936248E3532493AE255E078D77B39DFBAF66ED11A0AAE51ECA10B0C7C265E4E5B67619