Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-25 16:13:33 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 64E54FE94D39F7CDA0ADCF1ACD5E403BAA891995D71B283D0033E6D3ADAED28B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Si les limites méthodologiques de Cluster17 sont réelles, cela n'a pas empêché l'institut d'être un de ceux ayant le mieux prévu le résultat de la présidentielle 2022. Les autres instituts ayant, entre autres, largement sous-estimé le score de Jean-Luc Mélenchon. https://datapolitics.fr/presidentielle-retour-sur-la-performance-des-differents-sondeurs/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1717171043154936248
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 64E54FE94D39F7CDA0ADCF1ACD5E403BAA891995D71B283D0033E6D3ADAED28B
createdAtMillis - 1698250413932
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 171717104315493624864E54FE94D39F7CDA0ADCF1ACD5E403BAA891995D71B283D0033E6D3ADAED28B