Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-25 16:07:40 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5D1096249E30A170227D844F47D55B28032550C6A7731C6316B42C013F92C440
Participant Details

Original Note:

Si les limites méthodologiques de Cluster17 sont réelles, cela n'a pas empêché l'institut d'être un de ceux ayant le mieux prévu le résultat de la présidentielle 2022. Les autres instituts ayant, entre autres, largement sous-estimé le score de Jean-Luc Mélenchon. https://datapolitics.fr/presidentielle-retour-sur-la-performance-des-differents-sondeurs/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1717171043154936248
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 5D1096249E30A170227D844F47D55B28032550C6A7731C6316B42C013F92C440
createdAtMillis - 1698250060988
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17171710431549362485D1096249E30A170227D844F47D55B28032550C6A7731C6316B42C013F92C440