Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-25 16:03:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 12F7F7C7F66B3F4047377A7A7438D61C45A5B0F8CC78F0E876FC11270EB2BBA4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Si les limites méthodologiques de Cluster17 sont réelles, cela n'a pas empêché l'institut d'être un de ceux ayant le mieux prévu le résultat de la présidentielle 2022. Les autres instituts ayant, entre autres, largement sous-estimé le score de Jean-Luc Mélenchon. https://datapolitics.fr/presidentielle-retour-sur-la-performance-des-differents-sondeurs/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1717171043154936248
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 12F7F7C7F66B3F4047377A7A7438D61C45A5B0F8CC78F0E876FC11270EB2BBA4
createdAtMillis - 1698249806771
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 171717104315493624812F7F7C7F66B3F4047377A7A7438D61C45A5B0F8CC78F0E876FC11270EB2BBA4