Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-25 15:31:43 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 10F0872804CA319836C6C363C3FA21376C59F1667C892480232D10BDEF454EC1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Si les limites méthodologiques de Cluster17 sont réelles, cela n'a pas empêché l'institut d'être un de ceux ayant le mieux prévu le résultat de la présidentielle 2022. Les autres instituts ayant, entre autres, largement sous-estimé le score de Jean-Luc Mélenchon. https://datapolitics.fr/presidentielle-retour-sur-la-performance-des-differents-sondeurs/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1717171043154936248
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 10F0872804CA319836C6C363C3FA21376C59F1667C892480232D10BDEF454EC1
createdAtMillis - 1698247903561
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 171717104315493624810F0872804CA319836C6C363C3FA21376C59F1667C892480232D10BDEF454EC1