Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-25 21:19:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2711E13137F02159AE4DABC96D141D5EBBE7B5D74804684144F830681F8B4F2B
Participant Details

Original Note:

La désinformation sur d'autres réseaux sociaux touchent plus que sur Twitter, réseau utilisé par les journalistes en France. https://www.capital.fr/entreprises-marches/facebook-pres-dun-quart-des-images-politiques-postees-sur-la-plateforme-seraient-des-fake-news-1463098 Il s'agit visiblement d'une initiative ciblant Twitter arbitrairement pour son directoire, et non pas pour la lutte contre la désinformation.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1717149562106736928
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 2711E13137F02159AE4DABC96D141D5EBBE7B5D74804684144F830681F8B4F2B
createdAtMillis - 1698268766768
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17171495621067369282711E13137F02159AE4DABC96D141D5EBBE7B5D74804684144F830681F8B4F2B