Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-26 01:53:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 01A5A2763F748348864C49E762B0D742B553906FFB59A10C277E2966E0707BF9
Participant Details

Original Note:

性同一性障害特例法の手術要件は(1)生殖能力をなくす、(2)変更後の性器部分に似た外観の形成、の2点ですが、最高裁は(1)について違憲としたものの、(2)については憲法判断を示さず、控訴審の審理が不十分だとして高裁に事件を差し戻しています。 少なくとも現段階では例えば男性が陰茎を切除せず戸籍上女性に変更できる決定がなされたわけではありません。 https://newsdig.tbs.co.jp/articles/-/797792

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717140487172411487
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 01A5A2763F748348864C49E762B0D742B553906FFB59A10C277E2966E0707BF9
  • createdAtMillis - 1698285189555
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171714048717241148701A5A2763F748348864C49E762B0D742B553906FFB59A10C277E2966E0707BF9