Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-26 11:19:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36F9FBC079B0F064129F61E328F6B8A9F517C0D4BE7C5498EB6B314F1F2F140B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN "lawyer Natasha" is not even not a valid source, it's literally no source at all. Stop posting random X garbage and calling it a "source". Also this is clearly an opinion so there is no need for a note in the first place.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717122158470598700
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 36F9FBC079B0F064129F61E328F6B8A9F517C0D4BE7C5498EB6B314F1F2F140B
  • createdAtMillis - 1698319158964
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171712215847059870036F9FBC079B0F064129F61E328F6B8A9F517C0D4BE7C5498EB6B314F1F2F140B