Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-28 10:30:03 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 21010C21A0E4EAF80C9C0D95F6A75D9ACAB7E64051CD4D755ACB888B2242BD88
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN "lawyer Natasha" is not even not a valid source, it's literally no source at all. Stop posting random X garbage and calling it a "source". Also this is clearly an opinion so there is no need for a note in the first place.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717122158470598700
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 21010C21A0E4EAF80C9C0D95F6A75D9ACAB7E64051CD4D755ACB888B2242BD88
  • createdAtMillis - 1698489003271
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171712215847059870021010C21A0E4EAF80C9C0D95F6A75D9ACAB7E64051CD4D755ACB888B2242BD88