Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-25 09:48:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FFC7A9A60BE4E7CCF0B0E05A8543D3E07717ED49B46C4C3AAFABA79C75DA84B6
Participant Details

Original Note:

本判決においては、外見要件は維持されていますので、未手術のトランス女性が本判決を根拠に女性トイレや女湯に入ることはできませんし、「完全に合法合憲」ではないと思われます。 https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUE17D8I0X11C23A0000000/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717109244263293215
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FFC7A9A60BE4E7CCF0B0E05A8543D3E07717ED49B46C4C3AAFABA79C75DA84B6
  • createdAtMillis - 1698227314932
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1717109244263293215FFC7A9A60BE4E7CCF0B0E05A8543D3E07717ED49B46C4C3AAFABA79C75DA84B6