Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-25 11:54:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 419F3DD72FE279DA5B98464C4CCB9731F2341CE8C9E84BE1E777D6200C478334
Participant Details

Original Note:

最高裁は「変更後の性別の性器に似た外観を備えている」外観要件について判断を保留のうえ高裁に差し戻しており、今後、手術要件についても違憲判断が示される可能性が認められます。他方、提案済みのノートは最高裁が外観要件について合憲判断を示したと誤認のおそれがあります。 性別変更、手術必要とする規定は「違憲」 最高裁決定 - 日本経済新聞 https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUE17D8I0X11C23A0000000/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717100489194750188
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 419F3DD72FE279DA5B98464C4CCB9731F2341CE8C9E84BE1E777D6200C478334
  • createdAtMillis - 1698234855134
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1717100489194750188419F3DD72FE279DA5B98464C4CCB9731F2341CE8C9E84BE1E777D6200C478334