Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-25 18:13:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FD6C87BB97A6791B00808FAFB1D2458917E889AC2DA6A0B04E06BA5A1EFACAF7
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed, author clearly lays out their evidence. They are not lying, however there are reasonable debates to be had about the meaning of the evidence. Disputed this in the comments, not in CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717088184905981978
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FD6C87BB97A6791B00808FAFB1D2458917E889AC2DA6A0B04E06BA5A1EFACAF7
  • createdAtMillis - 1698257624067
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1717088184905981978FD6C87BB97A6791B00808FAFB1D2458917E889AC2DA6A0B04E06BA5A1EFACAF7