Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-25 08:37:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CBE5F559DF4A1B0D1FE6BFC1D6A71CA699839BBC94E3A0A22C3C5F3A5B92DD2B
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed, author clearly lays out their evidence. They are not lying, however there are reasonable debates to be had about the meaning of the evidence. Disputed this in the comments, not in CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717088184905981978
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CBE5F559DF4A1B0D1FE6BFC1D6A71CA699839BBC94E3A0A22C3C5F3A5B92DD2B
  • createdAtMillis - 1698223066019
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1717088184905981978CBE5F559DF4A1B0D1FE6BFC1D6A71CA699839BBC94E3A0A22C3C5F3A5B92DD2B