Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-25 20:23:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9B3404F662912A85DC9DF491D80C288FEC9CCB3EB15D9769F2FD0EAC8BC1FEEE
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed, author clearly lays out their evidence. They are not lying, however there are reasonable debates to be had about the meaning of the evidence. Disputed this in the comments, not in CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717088184905981978
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9B3404F662912A85DC9DF491D80C288FEC9CCB3EB15D9769F2FD0EAC8BC1FEEE
  • createdAtMillis - 1698265435843
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17170881849059819789B3404F662912A85DC9DF491D80C288FEC9CCB3EB15D9769F2FD0EAC8BC1FEEE