Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-25 08:42:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7C4A5309A2A38C26E3E4D3F7658C6C82DBA368B2412E34414CA5D51E9C332F3C
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed, author clearly lays out their evidence. They are not lying, however there are reasonable debates to be had about the meaning of the evidence. Disputed this in the comments, not in CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717088184905981978
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7C4A5309A2A38C26E3E4D3F7658C6C82DBA368B2412E34414CA5D51E9C332F3C
  • createdAtMillis - 1698223338219
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17170881849059819787C4A5309A2A38C26E3E4D3F7658C6C82DBA368B2412E34414CA5D51E9C332F3C