Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-25 07:50:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3D0CD1CD2BE409917F9AE09517A05D6635FCB2EF27170EA71A57BB71003BAC9C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN – tweet is factually correct & sourced. Even if the attempted CN was correct and adequately sourced—a standard it currently fails, referring to hearsay as "well-documented"—it would STILL be irrelevant, as it says nothing about the tweet being false or a misrepresentation.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1716914130827808779
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3D0CD1CD2BE409917F9AE09517A05D6635FCB2EF27170EA71A57BB71003BAC9C
  • createdAtMillis - 1698220205729
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17169141308278087793D0CD1CD2BE409917F9AE09517A05D6635FCB2EF27170EA71A57BB71003BAC9C