Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-30 14:34:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B69E3ABB3F06D7080509F500D7FA1B292C272EB18DC4A99BFB7EADEAFC726E99
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Rolling Stone has a high bar for journalistic standards. Like all news sources, they have let some false claims get published. When this happens a retraction is made. The proposed note merely references the opinion of another Twitter user as a source. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rolling-stone/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1716778724979253404
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B69E3ABB3F06D7080509F500D7FA1B292C272EB18DC4A99BFB7EADEAFC726E99
  • createdAtMillis - 1698676498946
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1716778724979253404B69E3ABB3F06D7080509F500D7FA1B292C272EB18DC4A99BFB7EADEAFC726E99