Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-24 19:22:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 807395E8A3CEEFFDEC3B2B20F30EF64987DF1FECC1967BE7BBCD4AA89CD16E80
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Rolling Stone has a high bar for journalistic standards. Like all news sources, they have let some false claims get published. When this happens a retraction is made. The proposed note merely references the opinion of another Twitter user as a source. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rolling-stone/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1716778724979253404
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 807395E8A3CEEFFDEC3B2B20F30EF64987DF1FECC1967BE7BBCD4AA89CD16E80
  • createdAtMillis - 1698175323764
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1716778724979253404807395E8A3CEEFFDEC3B2B20F30EF64987DF1FECC1967BE7BBCD4AA89CD16E80