Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-24 11:31:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 312477C4F7CFF86D8585CD474D1342C66FE8F2EE1F63973B7A53E8F00726EBB0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Rolling Stone has a high bar for journalistic standards. Like all news sources, they have let some false claims get published. When this happens a retraction is made. The proposed note merely references the opinion of another Twitter user as a source. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rolling-stone/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1716778724979253404
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 312477C4F7CFF86D8585CD474D1342C66FE8F2EE1F63973B7A53E8F00726EBB0
  • createdAtMillis - 1698147119943
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1716778724979253404312477C4F7CFF86D8585CD474D1342C66FE8F2EE1F63973B7A53E8F00726EBB0