Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-23 21:33:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E5AC00B6A35DAE1916417A97DA3B02A461D651D33ADA1B85160963F76C9997CC
Participant Details

Original Note:

De DIW studie in kwestie is al meermaals naar de prullenbak verwezen. Dit kan dus niet aanzien worden als feiten. https://energetyka24.com/germany-misinforms-about-the-nuclear-energy-diws-report-under-criticism-analysis#.XVYLB5VMJoE.twitter

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1716406474337825279
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E5AC00B6A35DAE1916417A97DA3B02A461D651D33ADA1B85160963F76C9997CC
  • createdAtMillis - 1698096839631
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1716406474337825279E5AC00B6A35DAE1916417A97DA3B02A461D651D33ADA1B85160963F76C9997CC