Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-23 12:08:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D7912DA9FC992D0BEA0D160629314446B11A46769FB089E4F6C10D77A8EAF8D8
Participant Details

Original Note:

De DIW studie in kwestie is al meermaals naar de prullenbak verwezen. Dit kan dus niet aanzien worden als feiten. https://energetyka24.com/germany-misinforms-about-the-nuclear-energy-diws-report-under-criticism-analysis#.XVYLB5VMJoE.twitter

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1716406474337825279
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D7912DA9FC992D0BEA0D160629314446B11A46769FB089E4F6C10D77A8EAF8D8
  • createdAtMillis - 1698062892808
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1716406474337825279D7912DA9FC992D0BEA0D160629314446B11A46769FB089E4F6C10D77A8EAF8D8