Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-23 14:22:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2AC85DE23B119B91AD7AC098DE70F221639E359D7EF57622EF0CCB22C2017F17
Participant Details

Original Note:

De DIW studie in kwestie is al meermaals naar de prullenbak verwezen. Dit kan dus niet aanzien worden als feiten. https://energetyka24.com/germany-misinforms-about-the-nuclear-energy-diws-report-under-criticism-analysis#.XVYLB5VMJoE.twitter

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1716406474337825279
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2AC85DE23B119B91AD7AC098DE70F221639E359D7EF57622EF0CCB22C2017F17
  • createdAtMillis - 1698070962896
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17164064743378252792AC85DE23B119B91AD7AC098DE70F221639E359D7EF57622EF0CCB22C2017F17