Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-23 12:56:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A380D9A2F30DFBCE01363ED7CB541AA84E89E5FF96F5A952D164749DC3B40253
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contrairement à ce qu'affirme ce tweet, Bruno Attal n'a pas "sous-entendu" qu'un viol serait justifié sur cette personne à cause de ses tenues. Il souligne simplement le fait que ces tenues sont inappropriées pour une député. https://twitter.com/Bruno_Attal_/status/1716097234025009460

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1716144017648296168
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A380D9A2F30DFBCE01363ED7CB541AA84E89E5FF96F5A952D164749DC3B40253
  • createdAtMillis - 1698065768433
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1716144017648296168A380D9A2F30DFBCE01363ED7CB541AA84E89E5FF96F5A952D164749DC3B40253