Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-23 12:52:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B9D0A92F4EA5971B3EE60D1957304D7210566DF22CEB20C1E30DADD0316087A8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Behauptung, dass die Metaanalyse fehlerhaft sei ist eine nur von Homöopathieverbanden vertretene, schlecht begründete Position https://netzwerk-homoeopathie.info/stellungnahme-des-informationsnetzwerks-homoeopathie-zur-beschwerde-des-hri-ueber-das-review-des-australischen-gesundheitsministeriums-nhmrc/?s=09

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1716008511060967494
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B9D0A92F4EA5971B3EE60D1957304D7210566DF22CEB20C1E30DADD0316087A8
  • createdAtMillis - 1698065521719
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1716008511060967494B9D0A92F4EA5971B3EE60D1957304D7210566DF22CEB20C1E30DADD0316087A8