Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-24 08:36:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F3A197DF10017A8567D18868DCD6DF74562451555855B534034C6C93D4DF2E58
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post accurately describes the facts of the events. The proposed notes either repeat the dismissed lawsuit's unfounded allegations, or push "biological male" semantics favoring one side of the transgender debate. Both are misuse of Community Notes to post opinion. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715831448354402784
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F3A197DF10017A8567D18868DCD6DF74562451555855B534034C6C93D4DF2E58
  • createdAtMillis - 1716539812471
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1715831448354402784F3A197DF10017A8567D18868DCD6DF74562451555855B534034C6C93D4DF2E58