Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-22 03:08:06 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A0EEB44C3CE341DF0892871BCDB55DB0E1C406F4D8668001E5F01A4DBCD5AA93
Participant Details

Original Note:

The statement summarises the Met's perspective on what happened, how they responded, and why. Their actions or lack thereof can be criticized in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715800081805217919
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A0EEB44C3CE341DF0892871BCDB55DB0E1C406F4D8668001E5F01A4DBCD5AA93
  • createdAtMillis - 1697944086979
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1715800081805217919A0EEB44C3CE341DF0892871BCDB55DB0E1C406F4D8668001E5F01A4DBCD5AA93