Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-22 14:37:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8D7E5004629B8C21B14ED6C2DA3BD09B1DFA244C1BB2A186D63EAF478FDB2050
Participant Details

Original Note:

The statement summarises the Met's perspective on what happened, how they responded, and why. Their actions or lack thereof can be criticized in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715800081805217919
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8D7E5004629B8C21B14ED6C2DA3BD09B1DFA244C1BB2A186D63EAF478FDB2050
  • createdAtMillis - 1697985463453
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17158000818052179198D7E5004629B8C21B14ED6C2DA3BD09B1DFA244C1BB2A186D63EAF478FDB2050