Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-21 20:53:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7C0E826FFA08AE1667AD415D42FF6E9AA5B0AE0471C1FEBBD367C3DEA5F1860B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The statement summarises the Met's perspective on what happened, how they responded, and why. Their actions or lack thereof can be criticized in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715800081805217919
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7C0E826FFA08AE1667AD415D42FF6E9AA5B0AE0471C1FEBBD367C3DEA5F1860B
  • createdAtMillis - 1697921608671
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17158000818052179197C0E826FFA08AE1667AD415D42FF6E9AA5B0AE0471C1FEBBD367C3DEA5F1860B