Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-22 10:48:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 636B801977DABABEAC33BC1F222E03C7840B66AA385C65387FB834D74894C09B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The statement summarises the Met's perspective on what happened, how they responded, and why. Their actions or lack thereof can be criticized in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715800081805217919
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 636B801977DABABEAC33BC1F222E03C7840B66AA385C65387FB834D74894C09B
  • createdAtMillis - 1697971738213
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1715800081805217919636B801977DABABEAC33BC1F222E03C7840B66AA385C65387FB834D74894C09B