Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-22 07:49:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 316E69868CAF74DE6355089BEC5169ECAD00EB3F77E1014E7F3179145C44779F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The statement summarises the Met's perspective on what happened, how they responded, and why. Their actions or lack thereof can be criticized in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715800081805217919
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 316E69868CAF74DE6355089BEC5169ECAD00EB3F77E1014E7F3179145C44779F
  • createdAtMillis - 1697960986880
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1715800081805217919316E69868CAF74DE6355089BEC5169ECAD00EB3F77E1014E7F3179145C44779F