Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-23 21:56:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BEA34BDD56A8C26585625506AF061A75B89A51B76C1902A976ED532C9BCFF90A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The editor who posted the controversial comments on his own behalf has since deleted his account. This statement is the official view of the journal.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715733824745988253
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BEA34BDD56A8C26585625506AF061A75B89A51B76C1902A976ED532C9BCFF90A
  • createdAtMillis - 1698098218518
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1715733824745988253BEA34BDD56A8C26585625506AF061A75B89A51B76C1902A976ED532C9BCFF90A