Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-22 01:18:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E10258C1BFE3037CD4B45E9E679CC158BF1F8BD40BF4E8A1AB3055B9A1D15DAE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. There was no false claim made. The op stated a fact. This is princess Beatrice. The account is alluding to her looking “creepy.” Which is a personal opinion. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princess_Beatrice

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715729003179602220
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E10258C1BFE3037CD4B45E9E679CC158BF1F8BD40BF4E8A1AB3055B9A1D15DAE
  • createdAtMillis - 1697937503276
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1715729003179602220E10258C1BFE3037CD4B45E9E679CC158BF1F8BD40BF4E8A1AB3055B9A1D15DAE