Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-21 18:18:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C8468270FD5B1F2819E50FA2F3E8106CF11A4BB406B7FF273A9905A260B2CCA3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article fails to provide a link to the actual nature article: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06503-9 The research itself is based largely on climate models, some of which are speculative. NBC characterizes the article as established facts which is misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715658971158065464
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C8468270FD5B1F2819E50FA2F3E8106CF11A4BB406B7FF273A9905A260B2CCA3
  • createdAtMillis - 1697912331675
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1715658971158065464C8468270FD5B1F2819E50FA2F3E8106CF11A4BB406B7FF273A9905A260B2CCA3