Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-21 11:06:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9B3CC119BE5BD430F3C30BD7ADDFDBD7A5ED35DE2303674D6B46AEDB00E5CA1C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article fails to provide a link to the actual nature article: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06503-9 The research itself is based largely on climate models, some of which are speculative. NBC characterizes the article as established facts which is misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715658971158065464
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9B3CC119BE5BD430F3C30BD7ADDFDBD7A5ED35DE2303674D6B46AEDB00E5CA1C
  • createdAtMillis - 1697886386579
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17156589711580654649B3CC119BE5BD430F3C30BD7ADDFDBD7A5ED35DE2303674D6B46AEDB00E5CA1C