Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-21 12:06:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3F02C38822C1FFC8453A379567D89C1D95A59CC7B53419592C5A9CB57A110E13
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article fails to provide a link to the actual nature article: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06503-9 The research itself is based largely on climate models, some of which are speculative. NBC characterizes the article as established facts which is misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715658971158065464
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3F02C38822C1FFC8453A379567D89C1D95A59CC7B53419592C5A9CB57A110E13
  • createdAtMillis - 1697890019373
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17156589711580654643F02C38822C1FFC8453A379567D89C1D95A59CC7B53419592C5A9CB57A110E13