Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-21 15:32:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 387B3C33C7FA8505E88233D734F0EEC6D632CBCBA872F7DF1A9FCC2C40EA6A46
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article fails to provide a link to the actual nature article: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06503-9 The research itself is based largely on climate models, some of which are speculative. NBC characterizes the article as established facts which is misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715658971158065464
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 387B3C33C7FA8505E88233D734F0EEC6D632CBCBA872F7DF1A9FCC2C40EA6A46
  • createdAtMillis - 1697902359746
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1715658971158065464387B3C33C7FA8505E88233D734F0EEC6D632CBCBA872F7DF1A9FCC2C40EA6A46