Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-21 12:26:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2E8E76C19CE8771751F55E8853F9543C836D635845002431E4F29732CD3F5AC2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article fails to provide a link to the actual nature article: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06503-9 The research itself is based largely on climate models, some of which are speculative. NBC characterizes the article as established facts which is misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715658971158065464
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2E8E76C19CE8771751F55E8853F9543C836D635845002431E4F29732CD3F5AC2
  • createdAtMillis - 1697891185501
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17156589711580654642E8E76C19CE8771751F55E8853F9543C836D635845002431E4F29732CD3F5AC2