Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-21 14:20:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 227F6F86664815C7E49527E555C9752B083946DC1E99F398471C799BD9B38DFA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judge in this case did not "try to" reverse the unconstitutional ban, he actually did reverse it. https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/courts/story/2023-10-19/san-diego-federal-judge-rules-again-that-californias-ban-on-assault-weapons-is-unconstitutional

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715657292551520457
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 227F6F86664815C7E49527E555C9752B083946DC1E99F398471C799BD9B38DFA
  • createdAtMillis - 1697898058786
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1715657292551520457227F6F86664815C7E49527E555C9752B083946DC1E99F398471C799BD9B38DFA