Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-21 07:35:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EE8E3E335D4A38282FE143D1C6D1A1E5E665C3ED9293B3758E9EC40416095A6C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The impact analysis that forms the core of this post is disputed by Open Source Intelligence experts, who claim it only relevant if the projectile had a natural, parabolic curve. In a misfired hypothesis, impact analysis is not relevant for determining origin. https://twitter.com/Nrg8000/status/1715498665669005582

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715600044173545763
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EE8E3E335D4A38282FE143D1C6D1A1E5E665C3ED9293B3758E9EC40416095A6C
  • createdAtMillis - 1697873755379
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1715600044173545763EE8E3E335D4A38282FE143D1C6D1A1E5E665C3ED9293B3758E9EC40416095A6C